<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu One Music Store, my answers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stefanoforenza.com/ubuntu-one-music-store-answers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stefanoforenza.com/ubuntu-one-music-store-answers/</link>
	<description>Stefano Forenza - Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:31:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jo Shields</title>
		<link>http://www.stefanoforenza.com/ubuntu-one-music-store-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-40829</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefanoforenza.com/?p=2049#comment-40829</guid>
		<description>Banshee will automatically transcode your files to a supported format when you use it to transfer songs to your portable player (e.g. FLAC to AAC, or somesuch). I don&#039;t know if Rhythmbox has such functionality, but if properly implemented, it could be a user-experience non-issue. I say &quot;could&quot; because the issue of patented codecs will cause serious concerns - i.e. Canonical can&#039;t be seen to encourage people to use unlicensed MP3 codecs, and can&#039;t sell files that don&#039;t play on Ubuntu out of the box, so there&#039;s an impasse there for people who don&#039;t already have codecs installed and working.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banshee will automatically transcode your files to a supported format when you use it to transfer songs to your portable player (e.g. FLAC to AAC, or somesuch). I don&#8217;t know if Rhythmbox has such functionality, but if properly implemented, it could be a user-experience non-issue. I say &#8220;could&#8221; because the issue of patented codecs will cause serious concerns &#8211; i.e. Canonical can&#8217;t be seen to encourage people to use unlicensed MP3 codecs, and can&#8217;t sell files that don&#8217;t play on Ubuntu out of the box, so there&#8217;s an impasse there for people who don&#8217;t already have codecs installed and working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK</title>
		<link>http://www.stefanoforenza.com/ubuntu-one-music-store-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-40804</link>
		<dc:creator>TK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefanoforenza.com/?p=2049#comment-40804</guid>
		<description>Ah, and I hope they make a way to integrate into current music players, perhaps as plugins, so folks can browse and purchase music without leaving their own music players. 

Or would that be too iTunes-y?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, and I hope they make a way to integrate into current music players, perhaps as plugins, so folks can browse and purchase music without leaving their own music players. </p>
<p>Or would that be too iTunes-y?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellipsis</title>
		<link>http://www.stefanoforenza.com/ubuntu-one-music-store-answers/comment-page-1/#comment-40702</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellipsis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefanoforenza.com/?p=2049#comment-40702</guid>
		<description>Would this music store &quot;sell&quot; free music/audiobooks/podcasts? Also could it be used as a tool to promote CC-licensed work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would this music store &#8220;sell&#8221; free music/audiobooks/podcasts? Also could it be used as a tool to promote CC-licensed work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
