Top 3 worthless things in technology

Here’s my top three:

ISO

As shown by the multiple irregularity claims, ISO is to be considered largely irrilevant.

Whereas in the past it has been assumed that an ISO/IEC standard should automatically be considered for use within government, clearly this position no longer stands.

CONSEGI 2008 DECLARATION (Brazil, South Africa, Venezuela,  Ecuador, Cuba and Paraguay)

OIN

Although I’m still not sure that TomTom paid more than a dollar to Microsoft, the TomTom settlement made clear (or, at least, apparent) that OIN is not that useful.

No linux defenders in the city at the moment – please call again later.

EU ( new! )

EU commission’s opinion didn’t prevent France to approve their new Internet Censorship act. As Internet is a innovative market, let’s innovate even more by sanctioning citizens without the need of bothering a judge.

Glyn Moody writes

“France’s ‘Loi Hadopi’ — better known as ‘three strikes and you’re out’ — was passed by the National Assembly late last night when only 16 deputies were present (the vote was 12 in favor, 4 against). Most politicians had left because it was expected that the vote would take place next week. In this way, President Sarkozy has sneaked his controversial legislation through the French parliament — and shown his contempt for the democratic process. So now what?”

[ Slashdot ]

Do you have any addition to share ? ;-)

This seems like a great time to subscribe my RSS !

One response to “Top 3 worthless things in technology”

  1. Sense Hofstede

    The Netherlands

    Europe is usually a frontrunner in open technology, for example: Firefox has a greater market share here than in the US and the EU has got it’s on open source license, the EUPL, under which it publishes some of its software. The French assembly and gendarmerie use Ubuntu.
    The Netherlands however seem to fall behind the trend of slowly moving to open standards. If I’m correctly there are even more IE users in the Netherlands than in the US. Furthermore the Windows OS is very popular and people tend to be afraid of anything that’s free. Maybe it has to do with our history as being the world’s merchants, but Dutch find it hard to trust something that’s free. I think there is no country in Europe where companies have so close ties with Microsoft via contracts.

    The government does encourage the use of open standards and has made it mandatory for the government, but some organisations manage to work around this by saying OOXML was approved by the ISO as an open standard or by saying they can really don’t do without proprietary standard X, which is a valid argument.
    We’re worse than the US.

Leave a Reply

Bills

Don’t forget to Subscribe

Latest Activity

Posts

  • LOL
    https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-desktop/2011-November/003467.html many lessons to be learned there * Share it !
  • Deja vu
    Reminds me of something. Share it !
  • Google this is ridiculous
    Google you’re doing it wrong. Very wrong. This is utterly ridiculous. It’s a screenshot with a standard Firefox browser, in the standard screen resolution (1280×800), on Read More
  • A step back from the open source
    One month ago, I created my first Android app. While the app was a paid one, the reception has been outstanding. I’ve gotten a fair amount Read More
  • Facebook shuts down EventPress development.
    When you’re a big company, especially one that makes its money on free web services and advertising, it’s very easy to say you love open Read More