<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple, Podium and Copyright gone bad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stefanoforenza.com/apple-podium-and-copyright-gone-bad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stefanoforenza.com/apple-podium-and-copyright-gone-bad/</link>
	<description>Stefano Forenza - Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:31:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stefano Forenza</title>
		<link>http://www.stefanoforenza.com/apple-podium-and-copyright-gone-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-31286</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefano Forenza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefanoforenza.com/?p=909#comment-31286</guid>
		<description>@azalea: I&#039;m not that sure they dislike Microsoft as much as they want people believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@azalea: I&#8217;m not that sure they dislike Microsoft as much as they want people believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: azalea</title>
		<link>http://www.stefanoforenza.com/apple-podium-and-copyright-gone-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-31285</link>
		<dc:creator>azalea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefanoforenza.com/?p=909#comment-31285</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s the easy way to get Apple to drop this.  Tell them they&#039;re behaving just like Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the easy way to get Apple to drop this.  Tell them they&#8217;re behaving just like Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous_is_right</title>
		<link>http://www.stefanoforenza.com/apple-podium-and-copyright-gone-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-31226</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous_is_right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 09:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefanoforenza.com/?p=909#comment-31226</guid>
		<description>Apple is a bunch of</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple is a bunch of</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharkbait</title>
		<link>http://www.stefanoforenza.com/apple-podium-and-copyright-gone-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-30925</link>
		<dc:creator>sharkbait</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefanoforenza.com/?p=909#comment-30925</guid>
		<description>Who uses &quot;POD&quot; as an abbreviation for &quot;iPod&quot;? Seriously. I don&#039;t think a single-letter shortening constitutes as an abbreviation. :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who uses &#8220;POD&#8221; as an abbreviation for &#8220;iPod&#8221;? Seriously. I don&#8217;t think a single-letter shortening constitutes as an abbreviation. <img src='http://www.stefanoforenza.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis Griffin</title>
		<link>http://www.stefanoforenza.com/apple-podium-and-copyright-gone-bad/comment-page-1/#comment-30916</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 02:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stefanoforenza.com/?p=909#comment-30916</guid>
		<description>Without intending to nit-pick, I should point out that what Apple is claiming is trademark infringement, not copyright.  That doesn&#039;t make the cease-and-desist letter any less ridiculous.  It would seem that the &quot;i&quot; portion is far more distinctive of &quot;Apple-ness&quot; than the &quot;Pod&quot; part - iPod, iPhone, iMac, iTunes, etc.  And yet look at competitors (iPaq, iRiver, etc.) that have successfully used &quot;i-Something&quot; without diluting Apple&#039;s trademark in the least.  I haven&#039;t done an extensive search, but my cursory glance through Google didn&#039;t find any cases of Apple claiming trademark infringement against Hewlett-Packard (iPaq) or iRiver America, which would have been the far more obvious candidates for a trademark claim.  Only time will tell if Apple can let this die in dignity, or continue to press the case in the hopes of using their resources and financial position to force Procreate into a settlement when they can no longer afford to defend the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without intending to nit-pick, I should point out that what Apple is claiming is trademark infringement, not copyright.  That doesn&#8217;t make the cease-and-desist letter any less ridiculous.  It would seem that the &#8220;i&#8221; portion is far more distinctive of &#8220;Apple-ness&#8221; than the &#8220;Pod&#8221; part &#8211; iPod, iPhone, iMac, iTunes, etc.  And yet look at competitors (iPaq, iRiver, etc.) that have successfully used &#8220;i-Something&#8221; without diluting Apple&#8217;s trademark in the least.  I haven&#8217;t done an extensive search, but my cursory glance through Google didn&#8217;t find any cases of Apple claiming trademark infringement against Hewlett-Packard (iPaq) or iRiver America, which would have been the far more obvious candidates for a trademark claim.  Only time will tell if Apple can let this die in dignity, or continue to press the case in the hopes of using their resources and financial position to force Procreate into a settlement when they can no longer afford to defend the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
